Well, first things first: Congratulation DeeDee! Way to go! DeeDee is officially graduating. Those of us who've been in classes with you will certainly miss you; it won't be the same...
FINAL PROJECT guidelines were set forth by Kim using 5 criteria:
(1) Your presentation to the class should be 5-7 minutes long,
(2) Organization of your presentation and project counts strongly toward your mark,
(3) The "scope" of your project should build on what we've done in class, not simply repeat what we've done,
(4) Your subject matter should be pertinent to ITEC 800 which is about "Learning Theory," and
(5) Your must document your work; that is you must provide references, cites, etc.
Motivation was the subject, and Kim expressed the irony of studing this subject at the end of the semester when, traditionally, motivation is at its lowest point. On this subject, don't forget that Karmiel's Midterm Wiki was about Motivation and is still active.
Historically, as a result of Behavioralism motivation was considered an extrinsic factor of learning---being rewarded for a good performance. However, in the decade of the eighties researchers like Keller broke ground with a view of motivation as bi-dimensional: extrinsic and intrinsic. Keller had studied with Gagne; hence, Keller's ARCS Model for stimulating and sustaining motivation shares some elements with Gagne's Events of Instruction, especially gaining attention and feedback. Also, both Keller's and Gagne's models are practical devices usable by teachers and instructional designers.
Kim introduced intrinsic motivation by noting that it generally results from parental influence on the learner; it can be either a positive or negative influence on learner performance. Kim also described a New York Times article on a S. Korean High School at which "performance goals" (an extrinsic motivational component) were straight A's and acceptance into Princeton University. We had considerable discussion on the topics of learning goals and performance goals.
We viewed the Power Point Slides which were part of the assigned reading and are available via the link in iLearn , and we examined the components of Keller's ARCS model. The PPT slides also include suggestions for teacher behavior and instructional design elements which correspond to ARCS. Additionally, they provide some food for thought about the generational component of motivation: Are Baby Boomers and Millenials motivated in the same way---by the same things? If you have not viewed the PPT slides, do so as they are a very good summation of the topic as it pertains to ITEC.
We concluded our class time with team work based on the two scenarios in Chapter 9. Our goal was to develop, based on the given audience analysis, a scenario for creating and sustaining the motivation of our learners. Every group's solution had elements in common, especially making the subject matter relevant to the learner's life experiences and making certain that every learner would experience a palpable level of satisfaction in accomplishing their goals.
---posted by Walter Hanley
Friday, May 9, 2008
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
Class notes, May 1st, 2008 - Subject: Experiential Learning/Learning Styles
We focused our discussion on the theories of a couple people: David A. Kolb (Learning Styles) and Bernice McCarthy (The 4MAT System: Teaching to Learning Styles); McCarthy was highly influenced by Kolb’s theory.
Kolb developed his theory on Learning Styles in the 60’s and early 70’s. According to Wikipedia, “His model is built upon the idea that learning preferences can be described using two continuums: active experimentation-reflective observation and abstract conceptualization-concrete experience. The result is four types of learners: converger (active experimentation-abstract conceptualization), accommodator (active experimentation-concrete experience), assimilator (reflective observation-abstract conceptualization), and diverger (reflective observation-concrete experience). The LSI is designed to determine an individual's learning preference.”
A few thoughts I wrote from our class lecture:
• In the last years his theory made a come back, specially in the business field
• We are not one-dimensional beings
• Kolb’s theory makes sense for technical people but maybe not for people in the research field
A questions that came up in our class – What do we think it is a good environment for learning?
• Practical
• Authentic learning
• Meaningful
• Individualized
In the discussion about the points (listed above), our teacher makes connections between Kolb’s theory and things we learned about communities of learning (cognitive apprenticeship).
Another question is raised sometime after the discussion above; how can we design a lesson that will give current learners to experience all areas of Kolb’s Learning Styles Theory?
By emphasizing the following areas (for our current times):
• Auditory – learn by listening – example given mp3 podcasts
• Visual – books with a lot of pictures
• Kinesthetic; 5% of population, part of population that love games and don’t hear things well
We watched a video about The 4MAT System. The system is based on Kolb’s theory and has 4 main areas of learning styles; Dynamic, Imaginative, Common Sense Learner, Analytical.
Then, we broke up in groups of 3 and discussed between ourselves examples of The 4 MAT System.
Preview for next class – we will discuss the motivation model; please refer to iLearn to see what is due in our next class.
Kolb developed his theory on Learning Styles in the 60’s and early 70’s. According to Wikipedia, “His model is built upon the idea that learning preferences can be described using two continuums: active experimentation-reflective observation and abstract conceptualization-concrete experience. The result is four types of learners: converger (active experimentation-abstract conceptualization), accommodator (active experimentation-concrete experience), assimilator (reflective observation-abstract conceptualization), and diverger (reflective observation-concrete experience). The LSI is designed to determine an individual's learning preference.”
A few thoughts I wrote from our class lecture:
• In the last years his theory made a come back, specially in the business field
• We are not one-dimensional beings
• Kolb’s theory makes sense for technical people but maybe not for people in the research field
A questions that came up in our class – What do we think it is a good environment for learning?
• Practical
• Authentic learning
• Meaningful
• Individualized
In the discussion about the points (listed above), our teacher makes connections between Kolb’s theory and things we learned about communities of learning (cognitive apprenticeship).
Another question is raised sometime after the discussion above; how can we design a lesson that will give current learners to experience all areas of Kolb’s Learning Styles Theory?
By emphasizing the following areas (for our current times):
• Auditory – learn by listening – example given mp3 podcasts
• Visual – books with a lot of pictures
• Kinesthetic; 5% of population, part of population that love games and don’t hear things well
We watched a video about The 4MAT System. The system is based on Kolb’s theory and has 4 main areas of learning styles; Dynamic, Imaginative, Common Sense Learner, Analytical.
Then, we broke up in groups of 3 and discussed between ourselves examples of The 4 MAT System.
Preview for next class – we will discuss the motivation model; please refer to iLearn to see what is due in our next class.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
